The deployment of WiFi networks can be particularly challenging. We’re going to take a look at three problems that occur when deploying in the 2.4 GHz (Gigahertz) band. In the three examples we’re going to take a look at, they will be real life examples.
A dual-band router is one that broadcasts both a 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz signal from the same unit, essentially providing you with two Wi-Fi networks and the best of both worlds. Dual-band routers come in two flavors: Selectable dual-band. A selectable dual-band router offers a 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi network, but you can only use one at a time. I was able to successfully connect to the 2.4 GHz side of my Orbi by not only turning off the 5 GHz SSID broadcast but also setting the signal strength to O or zero. That permitted the weather station to connect at 2.4 GHz, and it has stayed connected ever since, even after I turned the 5 GHz SSID back on at 100% signal. Newer Wi-Fi routers can broadcast in two different frequencies, 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz. Figuring out the best one for your situation can dramatically improve your network’s reach and reliability.
For instructor-led Wireless training, see our 5-day course: WIRE400: Wireless Networking for the IT Professional
We’re going to start by looking at the frequency Channels that you assign in the 2.4 GHz band, when you’re deploying WiFi access point.
Then we’re going to look at a common misunderstanding that occurs when you’re deploying 802.11n in the 2.4 GHz band, in terms of the achievable data rate.
Our third example is much more subtle.
Our third example, we’ll be looking at common mistakes Engineers make when trying to assess the signal to noise level, as to whether or not they have good WiFi coverage.
Example 1 – Frequency Channels in the 2.4 GHz band
Let’s start with real life example, number one. A look at the frequency Channels in the 2.4 GHz band, and how to assign a Channel to a wireless access point. We’ll see in this list that in North America we can use Channels 1‑11.
The mistake that most people make is they don’t distinguish between Channel numbers and Channel bandwidth.
Channel Numbers VS Channel Bandwidth
We need to understand how Channel numbers are assigned and then what is Channel bandwidth. How to read hard drive on mac.
If we look at this list of Channels that we can deploy WiFi on, in the 2.4 GHz band.
Notice that Channel 1 is at 2,412 MHz.
When we go to Channel two, it increases by 5 MHz. Then Channel 3, again increasing by five MHz.
Each of these Channels is 5 MHz apart. In other words, the spacing between Channel numbers, for WiFi deployment in the 2.4 gigahert band is 5 MHz.
In this live deployment, in a hotel in Denver, they have decided that they will deploy the access point using all of these Channels.
Here you can see one deployed on Channel 1, another access deployed on Channel 2, Channel 3, all the way up to Channel 11.
You can see here is the central frequency of the access point deployed on Channel 1, Channel 2, etc.
It’s a common misunderstanding, that when we look to configure our access point, and we’re given a choice of Channels 1‑11, that this IT professional had just gone ahead and deployed those different Channels to their access points.
You can see that Channel 1 indeed overlaps with Channel 2, overlaps with Channel 3, and in fact overlaps with Channel 4 and 5, as well.
Which means that, if you deploy access points on Channel 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, these will interfere with each other because they’re overlapping Channels.
https://pokerloco-bestcasinoinlouisiana.peatix.com. To understand what’s going on, we need to understand what Channel Bandwidth is.
Channel Bandwidth is the bandwidth that the signal occupies when it transmits.
Let’s say I’m transmitting on Channel 1. My signal will spread over a band. Apple store os x el capitan.
How wide is that band? That depends on the technology.
In the case of 802.11b, it would be a 22 MHz Channel.
In the case of A and G, it would be a 20 MHz Channel.
In our hotel, in Denver, they were deploying 802.11g, which occupies a 20 MHz Channel.
Because our Channels are actually spaced 5 MHz apart, what happens if you use Channel 1 and Channel 2 is that those allocations will therefore be overlapping.
If you’ve got an access point, here on Channel 1, that’s broadcasting out, and you have another access point that’s adjoining to it, that is broadcasting to Channel 2, then these are going to interfere with each other, because the Channels are overlapping.
Therefore, for deployment in the 2.4 GHz band, you should use Channel 1, Channel 6, and Channel 11.
By deploying them in a pattern, referred to as a One in Three Frequency Reuse Scheme, then you can reuse the channels some distance away.
Example 2
Let’s go on to our second real-life example.
Have you experienced when you’ve gone out and bought an 802.11n device, this one is a 2×2 MIMO which can promise to go up to 300 Mb/s. Or maybe you’ve actually bought a 3×3 MIMO 802.11n which promises data rates of 450 Mb/s.
But have you been disappointed that you can’t actually achieve these data rates? One of the reasons is if you’re deploying 802.11n and you want to achieve these higher data rates then you need to deploy it in a 40 MHz channel.
You can see in this example, that I have indeed got a 40 MHz channel.
But you will also noticed that if I’ve deployed one access point in a 40 MHz channel then I don’t actually have any spectrum left to deploy a second 40 MHz channel.
If you’re wanting to deploy more than one access point in the 2.4 GHz band, then there is simply not enough room to have two access points both operating on a 40 MHz channel without these channels overlapping and interfering with each other.
In other words, unless you have a deployment that just has one access point then you need to deploy “N” in a 20 MHz channel in order to avoid interference between adjoining access points.
If you “half” the bandwidth, then you “half” the data rate.
In other words, if you buy a 2×2 MIMO 802.11n device and deploy multiple in the 2.4 GHz band, then your theoretical maximum data rate in good RF environments would be halved to just 150 Mb/s. And the 3×3 MIMO 802.11n that you thought would give you 450 Mb/s because you’re only deploying it in a 20 MHz band the maximum theoretical data rate gain will be halved to 225 Mb/s.
This can often result in people being rather disappointed with the equipment that they bought. Their expectations on what data rates they thought they were going to get has not been satisfied.
Now if you do want to achieve the maximum theoretical data rates for an 802.11n device then your solution is to deploy it in the 5 GHz band.
In the 5 GHz band, you have a lot more spectrum available and you will be able to deploy multiple 40 MHz channels.
Example 3
Real-life example number 3 is much more subtle and a very common mistake that very good IT Professionals will make.
When deploying a WiFi Network, it is important that you have enough signal strength over any interference and noise that is occurring within the band such that you can recover the signal.
Many IT Professionals will look to measure the signal-to-noise ratio to determine what areas where they can get good WiFi signals and connectivity and what areas where they may not have enough signal strength or too much interference.
This is a real-life deployment. The engineer was out looking at the signal strength of the network and you can see that in this particular RF environment, there was a significant amount of interference.
When you look at this type of interference, it’s kind of a “hopping” across these different frequencies going backwards and forwards, they are like short spikes. Quite often, this is caused by Bluetooth radios that are also operating in the 2.4 GHz band.
There are many different Bluetooth that we own and use. Even though all of this equipment is low powered, if you are close to this equipment while you are taking your measurements, you could see some very strong interference.
The problem that this particular IT Professional had done he was taking his measurements when he was looking at the spectrum and the signal strength, he actually had his own personal equipment operating in a close proximity to the equipment he was using to sniff the WiFi network.
In other words, he was actually destroying his results. The results were showing significant Bluetooth interference whereas in reality, the amount of Bluetooth interference on this site was actually quite small.
So when you are doing spectrum analysis and looking at signal strength, you need to make sure that you are not the source of interference. Particularly if you have devices operating very closely to the equipment that you are using to detect the signal and the noise.
So the message is, turn off your equipment.
I hope you enjoyed this short video of issues that can occur when deploying WiFi in the 2.4 GHz band.
I do hope you enjoyed it and if you did, please do come back and take our 5-day Wireless course WIRE400: Wireless Networking for the IT Professional at Interface Technical Training in Phoenix, Arizona. You will join me and we will go through a lot more detail and have a lot more fun about how you actually plan out a WiFi network, how you configure, deploy and then subsequently manage that WiFi Network. We get into a lot more detail going beyond “G” and “N” and looking at 802.11 ac and a lot of the antenna issues as well. I look forward to seeing you in our 5-day course.
802.11g, 802.11n, Bluetooth, Bluetooth interference, Channel Bandwidth, Channel Numbers, Deploying WiFi Networks, WiFi coverage, WiFi Networks, WiFi planning
0 
Star